W. D. Wilson Printing Ink Co. v. Ford

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 538
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 538 (W. D. Wilson Printing Ink Co. v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. D. Wilson Printing Ink Co. v. Ford, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 538 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

Newburger, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury.

This action was brought on a promissory note given by the defendants. The answer is a tender. The tender was made on the 10th day of July, 1890, and the amount tendered at that time Was one hundred and fifty-three and 50-100 dollars ($153.50), which was paid into court on August 19, 1890. The deposit in [539]*539court should have at least been accompanied by the interest up to the time the deposit was made, for the defendant had the unrestrained use of the money up to that time. Murphy v. Gold Stock Co., 3 N. Y. Supp., 804-806; 24 St. Rep., 123 ; City Court, 1889.

In the case at bar, interest to date of deposit did not accompany the deposit, therefore, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Ehrlich, Oh. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Gold & Stock Tel. Co.
3 N.Y.S. 804 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-d-wilson-printing-ink-co-v-ford-nynyccityct-1893.