W. D. Gale, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph A. Schoenith and Mildred A. Schoenith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

297 F.2d 270, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 344, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2840
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 1961
Docket14552_1
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 297 F.2d 270 (W. D. Gale, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph A. Schoenith and Mildred A. Schoenith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. D. Gale, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph A. Schoenith and Mildred A. Schoenith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 297 F.2d 270, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 344, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2840 (6th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

ORDER.

These causes are before the Court on petitions of taxpayers W. D. Gale, Inc., •and Joseph A. Schoenith and Mildred A. Schoenith, individually, for review of decisions and orders of the Tax Court of the United States-. The Tax Court found that there were deficiencies in income tax of the taxpayers for the taxable years ended December 31, 1953, December 31, 1954 and December 31, 1955.

The deficiencies of the corporate taxpayer arose by reason of the disallowance of expenses of operating and maintaining speedboats used in speedboat races alleged to be for the purpose of an advertising and publicity program to promote the business of the corporation.

The deficiencies against the in-dividual taxpayers were based on the theory that the operation of the speedboats was for the personal pleasure and aggrandizement of taxpayer Joseph A. ■Schoenith and that the use of corporate funds for that purpose amounted to a constructive dividend to him, as a stockholder of the corporation. Joseph A. Schoenith and his family owned ninety-seven and one-half (97%) percent of the stock of the corporation.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties and oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the facts as found by the Tax Court are warranted by the evidence and neither the facts as found nor the inferences drawn therefrom are clearly erroneous; that the legal conclusions are in accord with sound principles of law, and the conclusion that the use of corporate funds for the operation of speedboats, for the personal pleasure of the principal stockholder, is a constructive dividend is supported by authorities. See: Sachs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 277 F.2d 879, C.A. 8, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833, 81 S.Ct. 63, 5 L.Ed.2d 59; Greenspon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 229 F.2d 947, C.A. 8; Zipp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 259 F.2d 119, C.A. 6, cert. denied 359 U.S. 934, 79 S.Ct. 649, 3 L.Ed.2d 636; Paramount-Richards Theaters, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 153 F.2d 602, C.A. 5; Sec. 115, Title 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.1939); Sec. 316, Title 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.1954).

The memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion of the Tax Court are reported at T.C. memo. 1960-1961.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decisions of the Tax Court be and they are hereby affirmed upon the Findings of Fact and Opinion of Jadge Mulroney of .the Tax Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midwest Indus. Supply v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 130 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
H. Kalicak Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 552 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Sieber v. Commissioner
1979 T.C. Memo. 15 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)
Barber v. Commissioner
1972 T.C. Memo. 56 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)
International Artists, Ltd. v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 94 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Commissioner
1970 T.C. Memo. 74 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Cambridge Hotels, Inc. v. Commissioner
1968 T.C. Memo. 263 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)
United States v. John William Gotcher Et Ux.
401 F.2d 118 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Lang Chevrolet Co. v. Commissioner
1967 T.C. Memo. 212 (U.S. Tax Court, 1967)
Wilhelm v. United States
257 F. Supp. 16 (D. Wyoming, 1966)
Montgomery Engineering Company v. United States
230 F. Supp. 838 (D. New Jersey, 1964)
U. S. Equipment Co. v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 261 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 F.2d 270, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 344, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-d-gale-inc-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-joseph-a-schoenith-ca6-1961.