W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 385
United States Customs Court·Decided October 18, 1956·No. No. 60288; protest 134461-K/1327 (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following United States v. Fred Whitaker Company, Inc. (40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rates applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content (T. D. 53159)” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 396 (cusc 1956).

37 Cust. Ct. 396 (W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.