W. & B. Hosiery Corp. v. Kapplow
This text of 158 Misc. 872 (W. & B. Hosiery Corp. v. Kapplow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As a defense to the tenant’s counterclaim for damages caused to his property through the negligence of the landlord in allowing rain water to leak through the roof into the apartment of the multiple dwelling, the landlord pleads a covenant in the lease exempting it from liability in such case; and the trial judge upon that ground dismissed the counterclaim. In the light of our decision in Villa Victoria, Inc., v. Fanning (157 Misc. 280), that covenants designed to circumvent the duties imposed on landlords under the Multiple Dwelling Law will not be enforced by the courts, the judgment cannot stand.
Final order and judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Misc. 872, 286 N.Y.S. 784, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-b-hosiery-corp-v-kapplow-nyappterm-1936.