W. B. Hogan v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
537 F.2d 238
Opinion
We have considered Hogan’s contentions, including his assertion of ineffectiveness of trial and appellate counsel, and his argument as well as his assertion that his consti-' tutional rights were abridged by the appointment of a psychologist, requested by the defense, rather than a psychiatrist to examine him for mental competency. We find all these contentions without merit and affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion, 417 F.Supp. 9 (N.D.Tex.1976).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W. B. Hogan v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 537 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1976).
537 F.2d 238 (W. B. Hogan v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogan v. Estelle
417 F. Supp. 9 (N.D. Texas, 1975)