W. A. Lloyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Fifth Circuit

W. A. Lloyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

301 F.2d 32, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5418

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1962

Docket19149

StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 32 (W. A. Lloyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. A. Lloyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 301 F.2d 32, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5418 (5th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact before the trial court, and that the appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellee is hereby affirmed.

Although this decision is in no wise the result of the failure of the appellant’s counsel to comply with the rules of this Court, it is to be noted that counsel failed completely to comply with the requirements of Rule 24 of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A., in that the brief filed by counsel contained no statement of the case, no specification of the errors relied upon nor a clear statement of the points of law or facts to be discussed.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact before the trial court, and that the appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellee is hereby affirmed.

Although this decision is in no wise the result of the failure of the appellant’s counsel to comply with the rules of this Court, it is to be noted that counsel failed completely to comply with the requirements of Rule 24 of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A., in that the brief filed by counsel contained no statement of the case, no specification of the errors relied upon nor a clear statement of the points of law or facts to be discussed.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 F.2d 32, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-a-lloyd-v-brown-williamson-tobacco-corp-ca5-1962.