W. A. Fraser Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

185 Ill. App. 455, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 1133
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 26, 1914
DocketGen. No. 18,907
StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ill. App. 455 (W. A. Fraser Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. A. Fraser Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 185 Ill. App. 455, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 1133 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding "Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Municipal Court op Chicago, § 13*—when proof is limited to claim made by plaintiff’s statement. In the Municipal Court, where formal pleadings are not required, the name given to the action by the plaintiff is not necessarily decisive of the right to recover, but he is limited in his evidence to the claim he has made. He cannot make one claim in his statement and recover upon proof of another, without amendment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Ill. App. 455, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-a-fraser-co-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-illappct-1914.