Home/Fifth Circuit/Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank

Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank

736 F.2d 160, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 345
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 1984·No. No. 81-1357·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestions for rehearing en banc as petitions for panel rehearing, the petitions for panel rehearing are DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestions for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank, 736 F.2d 160, 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 345 (5th Cir. 1984).

736 F.2d 160 (Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clara Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
798 F.2d 791 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Joan Rance Vuyanich, Cross-Appellant, and Marisu Fenton, Intervenor-Appellee, Marjorie Lee Jackson and Dorothy Hooks, Intervenors-Appellants, and Portia Williams and Martha Davis, Movants-Appellants v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, Cross-Appellee. Ellen Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, Cross-Appellee
736 F.2d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)