Vurimindi v. v. Prothy, Ct. Com. Pl.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 2016·No. 3 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, : No. 3 EM 2016 :

Petitioner : : :

v. : : :

PROTHONOTARY, COURT OF : COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vurimindi v. v. Prothy, Ct. Com. Pl., (Pa. 2016).

Vurimindi v. v. Prothy, Ct. Com. Pl. (Vurimindi v. v. Prothy, Ct. Com. Pl.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.