Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 24, 2015·No. 141 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, : No. 141 EM 2015 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : PHILADELPHIA AND OFFICE OF : ATTORNEY GENERAL, : COMMONWEALTH OF PA AND HON. : JUDGE SHEILA WOODS-SKIPPER AND : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, : PHILADELPHIA, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl, (Pa. 2015).

Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl (Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.