Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl
This text of Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl (Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, : No. 141 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : PHILADELPHIA AND OFFICE OF : ATTORNEY GENERAL, : COMMONWEALTH OF PA AND HON. : JUDGE SHEILA WOODS-SKIPPER AND : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, : PHILADELPHIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vurimindi v. v. Office of D.A. Phl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vurimindi-v-v-office-of-da-phl-pa-2015.