Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.
This text of Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty. (Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
VAMSIDHAR R. VURIMINDI, : No. 8 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HON. JUDGE DIANA ANHALT AND : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, : PHILADELPHIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vurimindi-v-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2017.