Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. County
This text of Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. County (Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, : No. 155 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HONORABLE JUDGE DIANA ANHALT : AND HONORABLE SHELIA WOODS- : SKIPPER AND COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurists from the caption.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vurimindi v. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vurimindi-v-v-ct-com-pl-phila-county-pa-2016.