Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Vurimindi v. Office of District Attorney

Vurimindi v. Office of District Attorney

129 A.3d 1235, 634 Pa. 351, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3061, 2015 WL 9437547
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 24, 2015
DocketNo. 141 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.3d 1235 (Vurimindi v. Office of District Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vurimindi v. Office of District Attorney, 129 A.3d 1235, 634 Pa. 351, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3061, 2015 WL 9437547 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.3d 1235, 634 Pa. 351, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3061, 2015 WL 9437547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vurimindi-v-office-of-district-attorney-pa-2015.