Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Vurimindi v. Anhalt

Vurimindi v. Anhalt

130 A.3d 1282, 634 Pa. 648, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 65, 2016 WL 347433
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 27, 2016
DocketNo. 155 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.3d 1282 (Vurimindi v. Anhalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vurimindi v. Anhalt, 130 A.3d 1282, 634 Pa. 648, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 65, 2016 WL 347433 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurists from the caption.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.3d 1282, 634 Pa. 648, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 65, 2016 WL 347433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vurimindi-v-anhalt-pa-2016.