Vulovich v. Baich

135 N.E.2d 40, 1 N.Y.2d 735
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 1956·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. In reaching the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, we do not find it necessary to rule upon the applicability of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Taking no part: Froessel, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vulovich v. Baich, 135 N.E.2d 40, 1 N.Y.2d 735 (N.Y. 1956).

135 N.E.2d 40 (Vulovich v. Baich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeAngelo v. Brazauskas
210 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
M.M. & G., Inc. v. Jackson
612 A.2d 186 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Flaum v. Birnbaum
177 A.D.2d 170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)