Vullo v. Vullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vullo v. Vullo

231 A.D.2d 864, 648 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed plaintiff to reimburse defendant for the amount of separate property she expended to satisfy marital obligations during the pendency of the divorce action (see, Shahidi v Shahidi, 129 AD2d 627, 630; 48A NY Jur 2d, Domestic Relations, § 2513, at 272). The record supports the court’s calculation of arrears due under the pendente lite orders. (Appeal from Judgment and Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Equitable Distribution.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed plaintiff to reimburse defendant for the amount of separate property she expended to satisfy marital obligations during the pendency of the divorce action (see, Shahidi v Shahidi, 129 AD2d 627, 630; 48A NY Jur 2d, Domestic Relations, § 2513, at 272). The record supports the court’s calculation of arrears due under the pendente lite orders. (Appeal from Judgment and Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Equitable Distribution.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Vullo v. Vullo, 231 A.D.2d 864, 648 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

231 A.D.2d 864 (Vullo v. Vullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related