Vullo v. Vullo
This text of 231 A.D.2d 864 (Vullo v. Vullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed plaintiff to reimburse defendant for the amount of separate property she expended to satisfy marital obligations during the pendency of the divorce action (see, Shahidi v Shahidi, 129 AD2d 627, 630; 48A NY Jur 2d, Domestic Relations, § 2513, at 272). The record supports the court’s calculation of arrears due under the pendente lite orders. (Appeal from Judgment and Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Equitable Distribution.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D.2d 864, 648 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vullo-v-vullo-nyappdiv-1996.