Vu v. Jaddou
This text of Vu v. Jaddou (Vu v. Jaddou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LINH THI MAI VU, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. Civil Action No. 23-2332 (CKK) UR M. JADDOU, in her official capacity as Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 26, 2023)
Plaintiffs are foreign nationals who have applied for an “immigrant investor” or “EB-5”
visa. Compl., ECF No. 1 ¶ 70. To apply for their visas, they each submitted their respective
Form I-526 in September 26, 2016, Id. ¶¶ 77, 83, the first and critical step in the administrative
process for such a visa, Da Costa v. Imm. Investor Program Off., 643 F. Supp. 1, 6 (D.D.C. Nov.
16, 2022) (JEB). The complaint alleges that, to date, the reviewing agency, the United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), has taken no action on their applications. Id. ¶
5. The complaint therefore presses one claim, alleging that USCIS’s delay is unlawful, and one
relevant request for relief, a court order mandating the review of Plaintiffs’ applications (i.e.,
their Form I-526 submissions). See id. ¶ 93.
Defendant has moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint, demonstrating that USCIS
favorably approved each Form I-526 in September 2023. ECF No. 5 at 1-2. In response,
Plaintiffs do not appear to contest this factual assertion, instead cryptically notifying the Court
that they may file an amended complaint. Currently, however, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter, so “it must dismiss the case.” Banks v. Harrison, 864 F. Supp. 2d 142, 146 (D.D.C.
2012).
Article III limits federal jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. Lujan v. Defs. of
Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). Where an agency takes the administrative action sought, any
claim of unreasonable delay is necessarily moot. Haider v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., Civ. A.
No. 20-3808 (CKK), 2021 WL 5630794, at *3 (D.D.C. Dec. 1, 2021). As USCIS has taken the
action Plaintiffs sought to compel in their complaint, this matter is therefore moot. Because the
Court lacks jurisdiction, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice by separate order.
Dated: October 26, 2023 /s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vu v. Jaddou, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vu-v-jaddou-dcd-2023.