V.T.Z. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

V.T.Z. v. State

819 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 2002 WL 1332529

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 2002·No. No. 3D01-543·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the charges of grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied conveyance.

Based upon the State’s proper and commendable confession of error, we vacate the adjudication and sentence and remand for a new trial. See Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that where transcript of trial “contains irremediable and substantial omissions and [915] obvious and egregious error in the portions which do exist,” new trial is required “in the interest of justice and due process.”).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the charges of grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied conveyance.

Based upon the State’s proper and commendable confession of error, we vacate the adjudication and sentence and remand for a new trial. See Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that where transcript of trial “contains irremediable and substantial omissions and [915] obvious and egregious error in the portions which do exist,” new trial is required “in the interest of justice and due process.”).

Vacated and remanded.

V.T.Z. v. State, 819 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 2002 WL 1332529 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

819 So. 2d 914 (V.T.Z. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related