Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/V.T.Z. v. State

V.T.Z. v. State

819 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 2002 WL 1332529
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-543
StatusPublished

This text of 819 So. 2d 914 (V.T.Z. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
V.T.Z. v. State, 819 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 2002 WL 1332529 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the charges of grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied conveyance.

Based upon the State’s proper and commendable confession of error, we vacate the adjudication and sentence and remand for a new trial. See Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that where transcript of trial “contains irremediable and substantial omissions and [915]*915obvious and egregious error in the portions which do exist,” new trial is required “in the interest of justice and due process.”).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. State
789 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
819 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 2002 WL 1332529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vtz-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.