V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 12, 2020

Docket2020 NYSlipOp 50734(U)

StatusPublished

This text of V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. (V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

V.S. Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of Moises Izquierdo, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., Respondent.

Law Office of David O'Connor, LLC (David O'Connor of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff and J'naia Boyd of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Phillip Hom, J.), entered May 31, 2018. The order granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the remaining branches of defendant's motion.

Insofar as is relevant to this appeal in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved to, among other things, dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches, based on plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the action. The Civil Court granted this branch of defendant's motion and found that the remaining branches of the motion were moot.

Laches is not a proper basis to dismiss the complaint in this action (see Arroyo v Board of Educ. of City of NY, 110 AD3d 17 [2013]; see also Montalvo v Mumpus Restorations, Inc., 110 AD3d 1045 [2013]; General Assur. Co. v Lachmenar, 45 Misc 3d 134[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51722[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]). Accordingly, the order is reversed, the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the remaining branches of defendant's motion.

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 12, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

V.S. Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of Moises Izquierdo, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., Respondent.

Law Office of David O'Connor, LLC (David O'Connor of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff and J'naia Boyd of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Phillip Hom, J.), entered May 31, 2018. The order granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the remaining branches of defendant's motion.

Insofar as is relevant to this appeal in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved to, among other things, dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches, based on plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the action. The Civil Court granted this branch of defendant's motion and found that the remaining branches of the motion were moot.

Laches is not a proper basis to dismiss the complaint in this action (see Arroyo v Board of Educ. of City of NY, 110 AD3d 17 [2013]; see also Montalvo v Mumpus Restorations, Inc., 110 AD3d 1045 [2013]; General Assur. Co. v Lachmenar, 45 Misc 3d 134[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51722[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]). Accordingly, the order is reversed, the branch of defendant's motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground of laches is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of the remaining branches of defendant's motion.

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 12, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vs-med-servs-pc-v-state-farm-mut-ins-co-nyappterm-2020.