Vrooman v. Schenectady Railway Co.

79 N.Y.S. 1150

This text of 79 N.Y.S. 1150 (Vrooman v. Schenectady Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vrooman v. Schenectady Railway Co., 79 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

.PER CURIAM.

Order (77 N. Y. Supp. 889) reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied with $10 costs. Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: “And that they be further enjoined and restrained, until the further order of the court, from interfering with the removal of the railroad poles and wires and the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein,”—upon opinion in Paige v. Railway Co. (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 266.

KELLOGG, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paige v. Schenectady Railway Co.
77 A.D. 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Paige v. Schenectady Railway Co.
38 Misc. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vrooman-v-schenectady-railway-co-nyappdiv-1902.