Vroom v. Wise

21 N.Y.S. 1135

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 1135 (Vroom v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vroom v. Wise, 21 N.Y.S. 1135 (superctny 1893).

Opinion

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is an appeal from an order made at special term denying a motion made by Charles Wise, the defendant, to have a judgment that had been entered herein for costs marked satisfied in full of record, upon the ground that it had been fully paid in settlement of another matter.

The only question involved on the motion below, and that is now presented for consideration on this appeal, is one of fact. We have carefully examined the record, and cannot find such a preponderance of evidence in support of the defendant’^ contention as to warrant us in disturbing the order made by the learned judge below. The order appealed from must be affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vroom-v-wise-superctny-1893.