Vroman Ice Cream Co. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Vroman Ice Cream Co. v. Porterfield

270 N.E.2d 348, 26 Ohio St. 2d 157, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 307, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 500

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 1971

DocketNo. 70-676

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 N.E.2d 348 (Vroman Ice Cream Co. v. Porterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vroman Ice Cream Co. v. Porterfield, 270 N.E.2d 348, 26 Ohio St. 2d 157, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 307, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 500 (Ohio 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant now seeks a review by this court of the decision below solely on a question of value, which is peculiarly a question of fact.

“It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues.” Citizens Financial Corp. v. Porterfield (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 53.

This court cannot find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI