Vreeland v. Wachendorf

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Vreeland v. Wachendorf

140 A. 922, 102 N.J. Eq. 336, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 605

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 6, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 173.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 173.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

Vreeland v. Wachendorf, 140 A. 922, 102 N.J. Eq. 336, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 605 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

140 A. 922 (Vreeland v. Wachendorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.