Vreeland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vreeland v. State

72 So. 3d 802, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16561, 2011 WL 4953417

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2011·No. No. 1D11-1880·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion seeking the appointment of counsel for postconviction purposes is not among the class of orders appealable by a defendant pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling by the circuit court on appellant’s pending motion(s) requesting that he be granted relief from his conviction.

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion seeking the appointment of counsel for postconviction purposes is not among the class of orders appealable by a defendant pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling by the circuit court on appellant’s pending motion(s) requesting that he be granted relief from his conviction.

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Vreeland v. State, 72 So. 3d 802, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16561, 2011 WL 4953417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

72 So. 3d 802 (Vreeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related