Vreeland v. Loubat
2 N.J. Eq. 104
This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 104 (Vreeland v. Loubat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vreeland v. Loubat, 2 N.J. Eq. 104 (N.J. Ct. App. 1838).
Opinion
It has been usual to make the mortgagor, who has parted with the equity of redemption, a defendant to a hill for foreclosure, but he is not a necessary party. The proceeding is in rem. An account may be taken without him. There is no reason why he should be made a patty-
The demurrer must be overruled, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.J. Eq. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vreeland-v-loubat-njch-1838.