Vredenburgh v. Scenic View Acres Homeowners Assoc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vredenburgh v. Scenic View Acres Homeowners Assoc.

878 S.W.2d 929, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 1994 WL 328344

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 1994·No. No. 65072·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County upholding the validity of subdivision restrictions and assessments levied thereunder. We affirm.

We find the single claim of error to be without merit; no error of law appears and the findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Only the parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reason for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County upholding the validity of subdivision restrictions and assessments levied thereunder. We affirm.

We find the single claim of error to be without merit; no error of law appears and the findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Only the parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reason for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Vredenburgh v. Scenic View Acres Homeowners Assoc., 878 S.W.2d 929, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 1994 WL 328344 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

878 S.W.2d 929 (Vredenburgh v. Scenic View Acres Homeowners Assoc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.