Vredenbergh v. Hallett

1 Johns. Cas. 27
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1799
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (Vredenbergh v. Hallett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vredenbergh v. Hallett, 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff must be allowed the interest on the amount of the verdict, until the time of taxing the costs in this action, and the same must be taxed, together with the costs. *

In all actions, founded on contracts carrying interest, and [30]*30delayed under similar circumstances, the . like interest may,, in like manner, be taxed.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Cincinnati Enquirer
10 F. Cas. 309 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1877)
Dowell v. Griswold
7 F. Cas. 995 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vredenbergh-v-hallett-nysupct-1799.