Vrabel v. Vrabel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vrabel v. Vrabel

502 S.W.3d 768, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184, 2016 WL 6871536

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103810

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 768 (Vrabel v. Vrabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vrabel v. Vrabel, 502 S.W.3d 768, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184, 2016 WL 6871536 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Vrabel appeals from the judgment granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions to enforce various provisions regarding property distribution in the 2012 judgment dissolving his marriage to Annette Vrabel. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and there is no error of law. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Vrabel appeals from the judgment granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions to enforce various provisions regarding property distribution in the 2012 judgment dissolving his marriage to Annette Vrabel. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and there is no error of law. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 768, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184, 2016 WL 6871536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vrabel-v-vrabel-moctapp-2016.