VPSI, Inc. v. Padula

651 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2016·No. No. 15-2114·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

VPSI, Inc., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the debtor’s motion for authorization to pursue a state court personal injury suit. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. See VPSI, Inc. v. Padula, No. 1:15-cv-00612-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015); No. 11-12985-BFK (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VPSI, Inc. v. Padula, 651 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2016).

651 F. App'x 228 (VPSI, Inc. v. Padula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Susan L. Eberhardt
E.D. Virginia, 2021