Vozila v. Brinks Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vozila v. Brinks Co.

288 A.D.2d 465, 735 N.Y.S.2d 391, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 465 (Vozila v. Brinks Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vozila v. Brinks Co., 288 A.D.2d 465, 735 N.Y.S.2d 391, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Brinks Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated April 17, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Altman, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Brinks Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated April 17, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Altman, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 465, 735 N.Y.S.2d 391, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vozila-v-brinks-co-nyappdiv-2001.