Voutour v. Mazzarese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Voutour v. Mazzarese

28 A.D.3d 671, 812 N.Y.S.2d 379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 671 (Voutour v. Mazzarese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Voutour v. Mazzarese, 28 A.D.3d 671, 812 N.Y.S.2d 379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (C. Goldstein, R.), dated January 26, 2005, as, after a hearing, awarded her only supervised monthly visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court properly found that the child’s visitation with the petitioner should be supervised (see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178 [1991]; Matter of McNeill v Ressel, 265 AD2d 484 [1999]) Adams, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (C. Goldstein, R.), dated January 26, 2005, as, after a hearing, awarded her only supervised monthly visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court properly found that the child’s visitation with the petitioner should be supervised (see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178 [1991]; Matter of McNeill v Ressel, 265 AD2d 484 [1999]) Adams, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 671, 812 N.Y.S.2d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voutour-v-mazzarese-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack