Vought v. State of Wisconsin
This text of 217 U.S. 590 (Vought v. State of Wisconsin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
VOUGHT, IMPLEADED WITH COLLINS,
v.
STATE OF WISCONSIN.
Supreme Court of United States.
*591 Mr. A.W. Sanborn, Mr. Frank B. Lamoreaux, Mr. Allan T. Pray, Mr. Horace B. Walmsley and Mr. W.F. Bailey for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank L. Gilbert, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, Mr. Victor T. Pierrelee, Mr. A.C. Titus and Mr. J.E. Messerschmidt for defendant in error.
Argued for plaintiff in error April 15, 1910.
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The Federal question attempted to be raised is without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 U.S. 590, 30 S. Ct. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vought-v-state-of-wisconsin-scotus-1910.