Vosseler v. Wheeler
This text of 99 Ill. App. 21 (Vosseler v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a judgment of restitution in a forcible detainer suit begun by the appellee against the appellant.
The merits of the case have been heard, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff had twice, once before the justice and again before a judge of the Superior Court, a jury having been waived.
The purported bill of exceptions is not sealed, and for that reason the evidence, upon which all assigned errors are based, can not be considered by us. Higgins v. Hide and Leather Bank, 88 Ill. App. 33; Elder v. Bennett, 79 Ill. App. 335; Bloomington v. Lishka, 78 Ill. App. 389; Harman v. Brigham, 78 Ill. App. 427.
We might add that we have looked into the so-called bill of exceptions sufficiently to satisfy us that the judgment below was not wrong. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 Ill. App. 21, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vosseler-v-wheeler-illappct-1901.