Vosseler v. Wheeler

99 Ill. App. 21, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 573
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 1, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 99 Ill. App. 21 (Vosseler v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vosseler v. Wheeler, 99 Ill. App. 21, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 573 (Ill. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of restitution in a forcible detainer suit begun by the appellee against the appellant.

The merits of the case have been heard, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff had twice, once before the justice and again before a judge of the Superior Court, a jury having been waived.

The purported bill of exceptions is not sealed, and for that reason the evidence, upon which all assigned errors are based, can not be considered by us. Higgins v. Hide and Leather Bank, 88 Ill. App. 33; Elder v. Bennett, 79 Ill. App. 335; Bloomington v. Lishka, 78 Ill. App. 389; Harman v. Brigham, 78 Ill. App. 427.

We might add that we have looked into the so-called bill of exceptions sufficiently to satisfy us that the judgment below was not wrong. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Bloomington v. Lishka
78 Ill. App. 389 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
Harman v. Brigham
78 Ill. App. 427 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
Elder v. Bennett
79 Ill. App. 335 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
Higgins v. Hide & Leather National Bank
88 Ill. App. 33 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Ill. App. 21, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vosseler-v-wheeler-illappct-1901.