Voss v. State
This text of 110 So. 670 (Voss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the sale of intoxicating liquor. After proving one sale of intoxicating liquor, the state, over the objection of the appellant, was permitted to prové another and distinct sale of such liquor.
*828 At the close of the evidence, the appellant moved the court to compel the state to elect on which of the sales it would ask a conviction, and it elected to ask for a conviction on the sale first proven.
The indictment alleges that the appellant sold intoxicating liquor, “on the — day of-, A. D., 1925,” and consequently does not bring the case within the provisions of section 1762, Code of 1906 (section 2098, Hemingway’s Code). Evidence of more than one sale, therefore, should not have, been admitted, and the error in so doing was not cured by the election of the state of one of the sales.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 So. 670, 144 Miss. 825, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/voss-v-state-miss-1926.