Voss v. Household Realty Corp.

687 So. 2d 972, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1201, 1997 WL 66532
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1997·No. No. 96-2565·Published

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The purchaser at a regularly conducted judicial sale pursuant to the foreclosure of a first mortgage appeals, and we reverse, an order setting aside the sale because notice was not furnished to the second mortgagee. We need not consider whether the lack of such notice may, under the law, justify the relief granted or any of the other arguments for reversal because the record demonstrates that appropriate notice was in fact given to the attorney who had filed an appearance in the trial court on behalf of the appellee. Under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.060(£ )1 that notice was entirely sufficient. In re Estate of Brugh, 306 So.2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed with directions to reinstate the result of the sale.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Voss v. Household Realty Corp., 687 So. 2d 972, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1201, 1997 WL 66532 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

687 So. 2d 972 (Voss v. Household Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Brugh
306 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)