Voss v. Baca

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 9, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-00197·Unknown

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 * * *

6 STEVEN FLOYD VOSS, Case No. 3:19-cv-00197-MMD-CLB

7 Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 PERRY RUSSELL, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 This is a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court are 12 Petitioner Steven Voss's motion to reopen, motion to file third amended petition for writ of 13 habeas corpus, and second motion to stay. (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 40.) Voss asks the Court 14 to reopen the action, to file a third amended petition that contains a new claim under 15 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and then to stay this action anew while Voss 16 litigates in state court whether that court should excuse state-law procedural bars. 17 Respondents do not oppose the motions. (ECF Nos. 41, 42, 43.) The Court finds good 18 cause exists to stay this action. 19 It is therefore ordered that Petitioner Steven Voss’s motion to reopen (ECF No. 38) 20 is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen the action and to lift the stay. 21 It is further ordered that Voss's motion to file a third amended petition for writ of 22 habeas corpus (ECF No. 39) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the third 23 amended petition, currently in the docket at ECF No. 39-1. 24 It is further ordered that Voss’s second motion to stay (ECF No. 40) is granted. 25 It is further ordered that this action is stayed while Voss’s current post-conviction 26 habeas corpus petition is pending in the state courts. Voss must return to this Court with 27 a motion to reopen within 45 days of issuance of the remittitur by the Nevada Supreme 28 Court at the conclusion of the state-court proceedings. Moreover, Voss or Respondents 1 || otherwise may move to reopen the action and seek any relief appropriate under the 2 || circumstances. 3 It is further ordered that with any motion to reopen following the completion of all 4 || state-court proceedings, Voss: (a) must attach an indexed chronological set of exhibits— 5 || resuming after the last exhibit number filed herein—containing the state-court record 6 || materials relevant to the issues herein that cover the period between the state-court 7 || record exhibits on file in this matter and the motion; and (b) if Voss then intends to further 8 || amend the petition, must file a motion for leave to amend along with the proposed verified 9 || amended petition or a motion for extension of time to move for leave to amend. The 10 || reopened matter will proceed under the current case number. 11 The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this action until such time 12 || when the Court grants a motion to reopen the action. 13 DATED THIS 9"" Day of November 2021. 14 _ 15 A , CLO _ 16 MIRANDA M. DU 7 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Voss v. Baca, (D. Nev. 2021).

Voss v. Baca (Voss v. Baca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)