Vose v. Vose

255 A.D. 1012, 9 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6265
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 1012 (Vose v. Vose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vose v. Vose, 255 A.D. 1012, 9 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

The action is to cancel three separation agreements made by the parties on November 5, 1926, April 5, 1928, and March 11, 1929, and for a separation. The court, by the judgment appealed from, canceled the separation agreements, granted separation and awarded plaintiff $6,000 per annum. Defendant appeals from the judgment and plaintiff appeals from so much thereof as fixes the permanent alimony at $6,000 per annum. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Finding of fact No. 42 is reversed as against the weight of the credible evidence and a new finding will be made that at the trial before Mr. Justice Walsh defendant did not state that his income was then upwards of $75,000 annually. Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion for a severance and a separate trial of the first cause of action prior to the trial of the second [1013]*1013cause of action dismissed. There is no such order in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Marco v. De Marco
73 A.D.2d 28 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Field v. Field
258 A.D. 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 1012, 9 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vose-v-vose-nyappdiv-1938.