Vosburgh v. Hanks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vosburgh v. Hanks

21 A.D.2d 926, 252 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3359

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 926 (Vosburgh v. Hanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vosburgh v. Hanks, 21 A.D.2d 926, 252 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision dated July 2, 1964 is amended to provide as follows: Judgment in favor of Peter Buchaldan in the action of Irwin Vosbürgh and Peter Buchakian affirmed, with costs. The amount of the verdict in favor of Irwin Vosbürgh as plaintiff is excessive and not supported by the medical or other proof and the judgments as to Irwin Vosbürgh are reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 -days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $12,500, in which event judgments, as reduced, affirmed, with costs to the respondent Irwin Vosbürgh. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decision dated July 2, 1964 is amended to provide as follows: Judgment in favor of Peter Buchaldan in the action of Irwin Vosbürgh and Peter Buchakian affirmed, with costs. The amount of the verdict in favor of Irwin Vosbürgh as plaintiff is excessive and not supported by the medical or other proof and the judgments as to Irwin Vosbürgh are reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 -days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $12,500, in which event judgments, as reduced, affirmed, with costs to the respondent Irwin Vosbürgh. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 926, 252 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vosburgh-v-hanks-nyappdiv-1964.