Vos v. Carroll

123 F. 1008, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4968
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided July 15, 1903·No. No. 48·Published

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

It is clear that the motion for a new trial must prevail. Dist. of Columbia v. Armes, 107 U. S. 519, 2 Sup. Ct. 840, 27 L. Ed. 618. This being so, it may not be amiss for me to express my opinion that both parties may find it judicious to come to a settlement of the case on moderate terms, rather than to encounter the uncertainty and expense of further litigation. A new trial is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vos v. Carroll, 123 F. 1008, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4968 (E.D. Pa. 1903).

123 F. 1008 (Vos v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

District of Columbia v. Armes
107 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1883)