Vos v. Carroll
123 F. 1008, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4968
This text of 123 F. 1008 (Vos v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vos v. Carroll, 123 F. 1008, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4968 (E.D. Pa. 1903).
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
It is clear that the motion for a new trial must prevail. Dist. of Columbia v. Armes, 107 U. S. 519, 2 Sup. Ct. 840, 27 L. Ed. 618. This being so, it may not be amiss for me to express my opinion that both parties may find it judicious to come to a settlement of the case on moderate terms, rather than to encounter the uncertainty and expense of further litigation. A new trial is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
District of Columbia v. Armes
107 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 F. 1008, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vos-v-carroll-paed-1903.