Vorlander v. Hokenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Vorlander v. Hokenson

175 N.W. 995, 145 Minn. 484

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 23, 1920

DocketNo. 21,625

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 175 N.W. 995 (Vorlander v. Hokenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vorlander v. Hokenson, 175 N.W. 995, 145 Minn. 484 (Mich. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The facts bring this case within the rule stated and applied in State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226, 158 N. W. 1017, and State v. City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479, 162 N. W. 477. No distinction in point of substance can be [485]*485made between the facts there presented and those here before the court, and the decisions there rendered are followed and applied.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The facts bring this case within the rule stated and applied in State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226, 158 N. W. 1017, and State v. City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479, 162 N. W. 477. No distinction in point of substance can be [485]*485made between the facts there presented and those here before the court, and the decisions there rendered are followed and applied.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 N.W. 995, 145 Minn. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vorlander-v-hokenson-minn-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack