Vorchheimer v. School Dist. of Philadelphia
This text of 430 U.S. 703 (Vorchheimer v. School Dist. of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
VORCHHEIMER
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Sharon K. Wallis argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Melvin L. Wulf.
Alan H. Gilbert argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Edward B. Soken.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] Solicitor General Bork filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 U.S. 703, 97 S. Ct. 1671, 51 L. Ed. 2d 750, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vorchheimer-v-school-dist-of-philadelphia-scotus-1977.