Voorhees v. Thomas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Voorhees v. Thomas

146 A. 927, 7 N.J. Misc. 571, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 226

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Voorhees v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 N.J.L. 134 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 21, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action of replevin instituted in the District Court of the city of Trenton. The judgment is assailed on two grounds—first, that there was no proof as to the value [572]*572of the goods in question, and second, that since the possession of the defendant was not unlawfully taken that there was no proof of a demand for their return having been made. The record does show that there was evidence as to the value of the goods in question, and that a written demand for their return was made before the action was commenced.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action of replevin instituted in the District Court of the city of Trenton. The judgment is assailed on two grounds—first, that there was no proof as to the value [572]*572of the goods in question, and second, that since the possession of the defendant was not unlawfully taken that there was no proof of a demand for their return having been made. The record does show that there was evidence as to the value of the goods in question, and that a written demand for their return was made before the action was commenced.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Voorhees v. Thomas, 146 A. 927, 7 N.J. Misc. 571, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

146 A. 927 (Voorhees v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.