Vonseydewitz (Frederick) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FREDERICK VONSEYDEWITZ, No. 82193 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
JAN 1 5 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY \
DEPUTY11-4-t
CLEF0
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying an amended motion for return of seized property. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying an amended motion for return of seized property in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
C2a41z)Ulika Parra guirre tig."1"
A•ksbau.0 J. J.
Stiglich Silver
,21-014fog
. ;•
cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Frederick Vonseydewitz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4WD 2 : .4 A 4:stiAk:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
478 P.3d 869 (Vonseydewitz (Frederick) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.