Von Voight v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.

130 F. 398, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4817
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMay 11, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 F. 398 (Von Voight v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Von Voight v. Michigan Cent. R. Co., 130 F. 398, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4817 (circtsdny 1904).

Opinion

HOET, District Judge.

The allegation that the plaintiff is a citizen of the British Empire is not a sufficient allegation that the plaintiff is an alien, and the subject or citizen of some one foreign power. Stuart v. Easton, 156 U. S. 46, 15 Sup. Ct. 268, 39 L. Ed. 341; Rondot v. Township of Rogers, 79 Fed. 676, 25 C. C. A. 145. If the complaint had properly • alleged that the plaintiff was an alien, the court, in my opinion, would have jurisdiction. The defendant, being a corporation organized under the laws of Michigan, could object [399]*399to being sued in this district; but the right to be sued in the district of which it is a resident is not strictly jurisdictional, but is a personal privilege, which can be waived. St. Louis, etc., Co. v. McBride, 141 U. S. 127, 11 Sup. Ct. 982, 35 L. Ed. 659. I think it was waived by a general appearance.

My conclusion is that the demurrer should be sustained, with leave to plaintiff to amend within 20 days upon payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blair Holdings Corp. v. Rubinstein
122 F. Supp. 602 (S.D. New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 F. 398, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-voight-v-michigan-cent-r-co-circtsdny-1904.