Von Schondorf v. Von Schondorf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Von Schondorf v. Von Schondorf

51 A.D.2d 1029, 381 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1029 (Von Schondorf v. Von Schondorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Von Schondorf v. Von Schondorf, 51 A.D.2d 1029, 381 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 4, 1975, as awarded her alimony and additional counsel fees. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The fixing of alimony and counsel fees is discretionary with the trial court upon its balancing of the various aspects of the marital relation, viz., the financial status of the parties, their health and age and the duration of the marriage (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). Within that framework, we do not find that the amounts of the awards of permanent alimony and counsel fees in this case constituted an abuse of discretion. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 4, 1975, as awarded her alimony and additional counsel fees. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The fixing of alimony and counsel fees is discretionary with the trial court upon its balancing of the various aspects of the marital relation, viz., the financial status of the parties, their health and age and the duration of the marriage (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). Within that framework, we do not find that the amounts of the awards of permanent alimony and counsel fees in this case constituted an abuse of discretion. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1029, 381 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-schondorf-v-von-schondorf-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack