Von Oepen v. Trammell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Von Oepen v. Trammell

29 So. 3d 239, 2009 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 429, 2009 WL 2096238

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 17, 2009

Docket2080057

StatusPublished

This text of 29 So. 3d 239 (Von Oepen v. Trammell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Von Oepen v. Trammell, 29 So. 3d 239, 2009 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 429, 2009 WL 2096238 (Ala. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 45, Ala. R.App. P.; § 30-3-163 and - 164, Ala.Code 1975; § 30-3-165(a),(b), and (d), Ala.Code 1975; § 30-3-169.4, Ala.Code 1975; Ex parte McGriff, 908 So.2d 1024, 1027 (Ala.2004); Henderson v. Henderson, 978 So.2d 36, 39, 41-42 (Ala.Civ.App.2007); Clements v. Clements, 906 So.2d 952, 957 (Ala.Civ.App.2005); Tatum v. Carrell, 897 So.2d 313, 324 (Ala.Civ.App.2004); and Giiggs v. Griggs, 638 So.2d 916, 918-19 (Ala.Civ.App.1994).

Each party has filed a motion seeking to strike portions of a brief submitted to this court by the opposing party. This court considers only matters properly submitted to and considered by the trial court; accordingly, we deny each party’s motion to strike. Toler v. Toler, 947 So.2d 416, 419 n. 2 (Ala.Civ.App.2006).

PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur. BRYAN, J., dissents, with writing, which MOORE, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI