Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

44 Haw. 260
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 1960·No. No. 4144·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

The petition for rehearing is granted. Argument will be had on June 30, 1960, at 9:00 A.M.

Counsel are directed to file briefs on the following questions:

(1) Under the facts presented in this case, and without consideration of R.L.H. 1955, Chapter 219, can appellee be allowed an attorney’s fee?
(2) If so, does such allowance constitute taxation of “costs” within the meaning of the first sentence of R.L.H. 1955, § 219-23?
Norman K. Ghung for respondent-appellant, City and County of Honolulu. Robert M. Rothwell for petitioner-appellee.

The Opening Brief shall be filed within 20 days, the Answering Brief within 35 days and the Reply Brief within 40 days from the date hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission, 44 Haw. 260 (haw 1960).

44 Haw. 260 (Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olokele Sugar Co. v. McCabe, Hamilton & Renny Co.
487 P.2d 769 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1971)