Von Glahn v. Lattimer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Von Glahn v. Lattimer

73 N.C. 333

DecidedJune 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 73 N.C. 333 (Von Glahn v. Lattimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Von Glahn v. Lattimer, 73 N.C. 333 (N.C. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

PeaesoN, C. J.

It is held in Ton Glahn v. Harris, at this term that all of the creditors of the bank are necessary parties plaintiff, and must be made plaintiffs directly, or by construction, in an action in the names of one or more of the creditors,, in behalf of themselves and all of the other creditors who may come in and take part in the proceedings, prove their debts, &c.

That point of law was reserved by his Honor and certain issues submitted to a jury. The case goes on one of the points of law. So his ruling upon the issues are superceded.

No error in the judgment.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeaesoN, C. J.

It is held in Ton Glahn v. Harris, at this term that all of the creditors of the bank are necessary parties plaintiff, and must be made plaintiffs directly, or by construction, in an action in the names of one or more of the creditors,, in behalf of themselves and all of the other creditors who may come in and take part in the proceedings, prove their debts, &c.

That point of law was reserved by his Honor and certain issues submitted to a jury. The case goes on one of the points of law. So his ruling upon the issues are superceded.

No error in the judgment.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 N.C. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-glahn-v-lattimer-nc-1875.