von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department

Fourth Circuit

von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department

668 F. App'x 446

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2016·No. No. 16-6336·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons stated by the district court, von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[447] tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons stated by the district court, von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[447] tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department, 668 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 446 (von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.