von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department
This text of 668 F. App'x 446 (von Fox v. South Carolina Judicial Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons stated by the district court, von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[447]*447tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-fox-v-south-carolina-judicial-department-ca4-2016.