von der Vorst v. Ruppert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

von der Vorst v. Ruppert

241 A.D. 763

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 763 (von der Vorst v. Ruppert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

von der Vorst v. Ruppert, 241 A.D. 763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment as amended by order entered December 19, [21] 1933, modified by directing that the defendant have an equitable lien for the sum of $4,007.56 plus such amounts as may be proven before the referee for moneys owing to the defendant by reason of the further misappropriation of funds of the defendant by Lorenz von der Yorst, the husband, with interest, and further modified by striking out the provision for the entry of a judgment upon the report of the official referee; such report to be submitted to the court and judgment entered on the court’s determination. As so modified the amended judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Conclusion of law numbered 3 is modified by striking therefrom the words “ with the proviso that the report of the said referee, with relation thereto, shall be deemed the judgment of this Court.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment as amended by order entered December 19, [21] 1933, modified by directing that the defendant have an equitable lien for the sum of $4,007.56 plus such amounts as may be proven before the referee for moneys owing to the defendant by reason of the further misappropriation of funds of the defendant by Lorenz von der Yorst, the husband, with interest, and further modified by striking out the provision for the entry of a judgment upon the report of the official referee; such report to be submitted to the court and judgment entered on the court’s determination. As so modified the amended judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Conclusion of law numbered 3 is modified by striking therefrom the words “ with the proviso that the report of the said referee, with relation thereto, shall be deemed the judgment of this Court.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/von-der-vorst-v-ruppert-nyappdiv-1934.